Do not record only the child who proves concern. Record the child who was actually there.
Good intent does not remove the duty to record the child’s whole signal. Where joy, agency, gaze, recognition, play, curiosity, preference, warmth, reaching, return, humour, or ordinary becoming are observed and relevant, leaving them out can silence the child as surely as misdescribing distress.
Positive child signal is not decorative. It is developmental evidence. It does not cancel risk, and it must never delay safeguarding action where action is required. But it must not be treated as less serious, less recordable, or less relevant because it complicates prior concern or an existing direction of travel.